Friday, February 26, 2016

Republican Debate

Friday, February 26 The New York Times published an article called Republican Debate Takeaways: Descent Into a Free-for-All.

Yesterday night I set down and watched the last half of the Republican Debate and it was a very entertaining Debate.  The author of this article just concentrated on three candidates which i think its really unfair because all 5 of the candidates did their part. He pointed out the most important issues that went on yesterday night. The candidates Mr.Cruz, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Trump kept going back and forth arguing and proving their points. Mr. Rubio and Mr. Cruz kept attacking Mr. Trump by pointing out all the issues his going though and how he keeps repeating himself over and over again. They worked as a team in a way to go against Mr. Trump. They see who the biggest rival is and they needed this debate to proof to the audience why Mr. Trump wont be the great president he claims he'll be.
I agree with the article when it says "This was a nasty debate". Mr. Rubio, Mr. Trump, and Mr. Cruz kept insulting each other in many ways. Even calling each other names. In my opinion i think Mr. Trump was very childish and rude, He was being attacked yes but with facts. He didn't know how to take it and started attacking his opponents in a rude way instead of acting professional. All Mr. Trump would do is talk over them and not let them finish. Mr. Trump made some pretty good points but his opponents had a better comeback (Mr. Cruz, Mr. Rubio)
As for Mr. Kasich he was more conservative. I believe he has a lot of knowledge but he didn't want to be part of the attacking that was going on in the debate. So there's not really much to say about him other than that he is a great candidate and a very very professional man.
Unfortunately for Mr. Carson he didn't even get noticed. He didn't show authority and didn't proof his points. I think its Unfair that he didn't even get mentioned in this article. Even tho he didn't speak much he was part of the debate and as so he should've been in the article. At least mentioning how lost he was in the debate or something not just ignore him and erasing him off the map.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Hello!